Principles
There is limited understanding of the
role of drugs in the causation of traffic collisions. There
is no doubt that large numbers of people drive after
ingesting drugs from all sources: prescribed,
over-the-counter, recreational and illicit. In various
studies within Australia and overseas, drugs have been found
in up to 10 - 15% of people who have died as a result of
road trauma. However, given the high incidence of drug use
within the community the correlation between drug use and
road trauma remains clouded. Major problems There are major
problem to be faced in attempting to find a correlation
between drug consumption and road trauma.
Can we prove that a drug
has been consumed?
This requires analysis of a body
fluid to identify the drug. There are a large number of
potential drugs that could be screened, and many of the
drugs of interest may only be present in minute
quantities whilst having significant effects. It is
economically impossible to screen for all possible
psychoactive drugs, so that our knowledge is patchy at
best.
Can we determine much drug has
been consumed?
Whilst it may be possible to
detect a drug, it may not be possible to determine the
quantity present. The very potent synthetic narcotics and
stimulants typify the problem. It is sometimes impossible
to quantify a substance even if its presence can be
demonstrated.
Could the amount of drug detected
produce impairment?
Does this substance cause
impairment of human skills?
If so, is such impairment
universal or idiosyncratic?
Does the impairment occur
in normal dosages or only when used in
excess?
Anti-anxiety drugs
The benzodiazepine group of drugs
includes minor tranquillisers, sedatives, anticonvulsants
and hypnotics. Representative members of the group are
diazepam, oxazepam, nitrazepam and flunitrazepam. These
drugs have largely taken the place of the barbiturates in
the treatment of anxiety and insomnia because of their
efficacy and safety even with overdose.
Different members of the class
depress the central nervous system to varying degrees and in
qualitatively different ways. Some are better at relieving
pathological anxiety and agitation and are classified as
tranquillisers. Others are more sedating and hence are used
to treat insomnia. Some members of the group are primarily
used in epilepsy as anticonvulsants. There is no sharp
distinction between any of these effects and higher doses of
any of the benzodiazepines may induce sedation and
coma.
The serum level of each of the
benzodiazepines is related to the degree of impairment in
the laboratory. There is an increased risk of personal
injury crashes among drivers using anti-anxiety drugs
compared with the rest of the population and this is
exacerbated by alcohol. There is a hangover effect and a
small dose of alcohol the following day can potentiate the
effect. There is a decrement in tasks requiring vigilance at
low doses and tolerance is only occasionally noted. The
opposite effect, exaggerated impairment, has also been
documented.
The risk of collision is doubled for
patients taking benzodiazepines especially in the first two
weeks of treatment. The ICADTS working group concluded that
patients should be warned not to drive in the first two
weeks of treatment. However, not all research has found an
association between sedative use and collision risk.
Clinically anxious patients are also poor drivers. in the
first place and treatment with benzodiazepine tranquillisers
will improve clinical anxiety. There is no evidence it
improves driving ability.
Psychoactive Medication
The untreated psychiatric patient is
a potentially hazardous driver either because of the
underlying illness and the consequent disorder of the mind,
or of the associated psychomotor impairment. Once stabilised
on medication, patients are better on their medication and a
greater risk without it. There is some question about the
generality of this conclusion as it has been based primarily
on subjective clinical judgment without inadequate research
backing.
Different members of each class of
psychoactive medication have quite different effects on
driving. For instance, the tricyclic antidepressants are
quite impairing of driving skill, whilst the selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants have
lesser effect on driving and little or no interaction with
alcohol.
Opioid Analgesics
The opiate drugs - heroin, methadone,
codeine and related compounds - are used for pain relief and
the suppression of cough. They have a high addiction
potential. Acute sedation and impairment is observed in a
dose-related manner and there is a deleterious interaction
with alcohol, although the effects are slight compared with
alcohol. Methadone is used for the long-term maintenance
therapy of narcotic addicts and is not associated with an
increase in collision risk after the initial stabilisation
period.
Minor Analgesics and
Anti-arthritics
There are few central side effects of
the common minor painkillers (aspirin, paracetamol) or of
the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents that are used for
the treatment of arthritis.
|